
Which nature do you want to save, … the man-made one you see today, or the original one? ‘This question from the audience shattered me,’ said my friend Prof Rajesh Gopinath, an environmentalist who was part of a panel discussion. Getting back to normalcy, he replied, ‘Choice is yours, but Mother Nature will not wait for you to save her.’ ‘It was indeed a good reply.’ I told Rajesh, but in a way, he had provoked my thoughts. I asked Rajesh, ‘What is ‘man-made nature? What did that participant want to know?’ Because if man creates nature, it is unnatural and not natural. So, for me, it appears that man-made nature is one that evolved due to the exploitation of natural resources. It is the human-nature interface that has changed the very definition of what was once natural. What our forefathers saw on planet Earth is not what we are seeing today. On the one hand, it was due to natural evolution over millions of years, and on the other, the man-made destruction in the last few decades.
Could we recreate an environment where dinosaurs were freely moving on the planet? Science has relied on certain assumptions based on material evidence and theories constructed thereon. We can only simulate that Mother Nature was like this during the Jurassic era, or perhaps see the movie Jurassic Park again to relive the bygone era. Nature has undergone changes that are beyond human conception. Those who lived in the 20th century during their early years and are still living in the 21st century, like me, may perhaps speak and recollect the school days when, on holidays, we visited the nearby villages, spent time on farms, and enjoyed swimming in the small rivulets. Where are those rivulets now? Right under our noses, we miss the sparrows to a large extent. Many bird and animal species have become extinct. The smell of soil when it rains and the frequent rainbows, lightning, and thunder are now rarities.
Precisely, today’s nature is not what people like me experienced during their youth. Within 50 years, I can confidently tell that the present-day environment is not the same as the one that prevailed in the 1960s and 70s. Anthropological changes have impacted nature. The pre-industrialisation era was far better than what it is now. Rightly, the Paris Convention decided to reverse the damage that human beings had made to the environment, choosing the pre-industrialisation global mean temperature as a benchmark. It is understandable because we cannot return to an endless past, and we need a zero point to go forward. Global warming and climate change are major concerns today. We continuously debate how to reduce carbon footprints. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are now deadlines that institutions struggle to meet within the given time frame set by their duty-bound bosses, least realising that the environment can never be saved in air-conditioned halls. Only a few like Rajesh take it seriously and wish to contribute their part to nature. Let nature be natural, and humans, who live for a short while, must not tamper with it (Representative picture from the internet)






























Leave a comment