Are they all due to officials’ negligence, public callousness, political empathy, or a surge in population?

Why did the Bangalore RCB stampede in the Chinnaswamy stadium on June 5, 2025, result in at least 11 deaths and 33 injuries? A stampede at New Delhi Railway Station on the night of February 15, 2025, resulted in at least 18 fatalities and 15 injuries. 30 people died and 60 were injured in a stampede at the Maha Kumbh Mela in Prayagraj on January 29, 2025.  During the Pushpa 2, one woman died when she came to see Allu Arjun on December 4, 2024. The reason for the recent Mumbai train deaths is attributed to overcrowding, which made passengers clinging to the door fall onto the railway line and be run over by a train from the opposite direction. Why did the Kumbh Mela deaths happen?  At least 82 people were killed in four incidents of stampede at Maha Kumbh in Uttar Pradesh’s Prayagraj on January 29, against the State government’s official claim of 37 deaths, a report by BBC News Hindi claimed.

After any mishap, many doubts arise in our minds!  We need to apply our minds to understand and avert future occurrences of similar incidents.  We should develop a similarity to all these incidents. One common reason is the bungling, callousness, and lack of far-sightedness of the people at the helm of affairs. Crowd management is a tricky proposition. In a wedding ceremony, if 300 people are expected, but 1000 turn up, arranging food is a challenge. If we arrange food for 300 while only 100 turn up, it is food waste. It is a catch-22 situation. Overcrowding is not an isolated problem for any city. Such stampede incidents are increasing nowadays. Airports look crowded bus stations, and incidents of verbal fights between staff and passengers are reported. Airlines started advising passengers to report 4 hours in advance to avoid congestion. As the workload increases multifold, the administrative staff find it stressful to work. So, who is to blame, the Government, people, bureaucrats, workers, or infrastructure? This blame game will serve no purpose. India should plan a holistic approach to all crowd-related issues. We have seen two such occasions in general. Firstly, such unpredictable stampedes occur during religious or sports gatherings due to a sudden influx. The second one is routine and happens in bus stands and railway stations, where people violate the rules to reach their destination on time. While the permission in the first instance, which is unpredictable, should be on a selective basis, the second one must be managed professionally by deploying a better workforce and risk management tools, as it is somewhat predictable. The main reason behind the recent stampedes, due to overcrowding, is India’s unabated population growth. India’s major problem is our rapid population growth. We have surpassed China’s population figure. Our population is 143.81 crores (as of 2023). Now this must be still more. In the last century, we had fewer instances, while challenges are more prevalent at present. On July 11, every year, the whole world pledges to control population growth, but unfortunately, life goes on as usual. The ensuing period will be more challenging!

A human chain that vows to handcuff the proponents of a lethal biogas plant in the North Chennai residential area!

In the South Express issue of April 26, 2025, we reported the unhappiness of the residents against the Greater Chennai Corporation’s (GCC) waste-to-energy (WTE) project at Kodungaiyur in crowded North Chennai in our editorial. We also highlighted that the residents came together under the Federation of North Chennai Resident Welfare Associations on April 13, 2025, to protest against the GCC’s WTE component of the integrated waste management facility (IWMF), planned for Kodungaiyur in North Chennai, on a 75-acre Metro water land near the existing dump yard. The trigger for the people’s unrest was the recent signing of an agreement to burn 1400 tons of non-biodegradable waste generated in a day. The project involving Rs 1026 Cr was to be implemented in 25 years under a Public-Private partnership. The Federation passed a resolution to stage a massive human chain on 25^th May, 2025. There was no positive response from the Corporation.

As planned, the 4 km long human chain started from Kodungaiyur and ended at Vyasarbadi Ambedkar College. One who knows the intricacies of event management for such non-political, non-governmental movements will agree that it is not an easy task to bring together 10,000 people in a single line to form a mammoth human chain. The fact that 10,000 gathered to form the chain speaks to people’s commitment to stopping the massive waste burning. People who joined the signature campaign and human chain demonstration are mostly from a marginalised community in the thickly populated North Chennai Corporation area, who always felt that they were the most neglected lot. Understandably, landfills and pollution had already taken a heavy toll on their health and lives in the last 3 decades. The proposed waste burning project will only add to the misery of their lives. The President of the Federation, T.K. Shanmugam, asserts in a press release that they do not advocate any alternative model for the incinerator but reject the very burning of waste. One can feel the pain in his voice, and it is not just his voice but that of millions of residents around. Why don’t they relocate the project near the Secretariat, if it is not going to be harmful, asks Shanmugam. Federation demands the scrapping of the project. They want the Government to expedite the retrieval of the 352 acres of landfill area by biomining and establish a mega library, an international auditorium, a medical college cum hospital, an indoor stadium and a biodiversity park. Demanding an exclusive environment policy for North Chennai, the Federation pins its hopes on a positive response from the Tamil Nadu State Government and North Chennai Corporation. Pure water and clean air are often a distant dream, especially for the marginalised community. Only time will tell whether their hopes will come true!

Which nature do you want to save, … the man-made one you see today, or the original one? ‘This question from the audience shattered me,’ said my friend Prof Rajesh Gopinath, an environmentalist who was part of a panel discussion. Getting back to normalcy, he replied, ‘Choice is yours, but Mother Nature will not wait for you to save her.’ ‘It was indeed a good reply.’ I told Rajesh, but in a way, he had provoked my thoughts. I asked Rajesh, ‘What is ‘man-made nature? What did that participant want to know?’ Because if man creates nature, it is unnatural and not natural. So, for me, it appears that man-made nature is one that evolved due to the exploitation of natural resources. It is the human-nature interface that has changed the very definition of what was once natural. What our forefathers saw on planet Earth is not what we are seeing today. On the one hand, it was due to natural evolution over millions of years, and on the other, the man-made destruction in the last few decades.

Could we recreate an environment where dinosaurs were freely moving on the planet? Science has relied on certain assumptions based on material evidence and theories constructed thereon. We can only simulate that Mother Nature was like this during the Jurassic era, or perhaps see the movie Jurassic Park again to relive the bygone era. Nature has undergone changes that are beyond human conception. Those who lived in the 20^th century during their early years and are still living in the 21^st century, like me, may perhaps speak and recollect the school days when, on holidays, we visited the nearby villages, spent time on farms, and enjoyed swimming in the small rivulets. Where are those rivulets now? Right under our noses, we miss the sparrows to a large extent. Many bird and animal species have become extinct. The smell of soil when it rains and the frequent rainbows, lightning, and thunder are now rarities.

Precisely, today’s nature is not what people like me experienced during their youth. Within 50 years, I can confidently tell that the present-day environment is not the same as the one that prevailed in the 1960s and 70s. Anthropological changes have impacted nature. The pre-industrialisation era was far better than what it is now. Rightly, the Paris Convention decided to reverse the damage that human beings had made to the environment, choosing the pre-industrialisation global mean temperature as a benchmark.  It is understandable because we cannot return to an endless past, and we need a zero point to go forward. Global warming and climate change are major concerns today. We continuously debate how to reduce carbon footprints. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are now deadlines that institutions struggle to meet within the given time frame set by their duty-bound bosses, least realising that the environment can never be saved in air-conditioned halls. Only a few like Rajesh take it seriously and wish to contribute their part to nature. Let nature be natural, and humans, who live for a short while, must not tamper with it (Representative picture from the internet)

Dry leaves are a menace! We are fed up with them when the trees shed their leaves during dry periods!

It is quite strange to see many getting disturbed about the dry leaves. More often, we find people burning the fallen leaves because they do not know what to do with them.  Of course, the ‘easiest’ way to dispose of waste, garbage, and plastic items seems to be burning. Burning releases the carbon trapped in dry leaves, emitting harmful gases and even worse particulate matter.  In India, there are generally two dry seasons during which leaves are shed, namely, just before the monsoon and summer. The most common of these are Neem, Populus, Maple tree, and Peach. Leaves reappear with the arrival of the spring season. This process of shedding leaves is called as abscission or leaf fall.

The trees that shed leaves are called deciduous trees. Before shedding, leaves change colour from green to yellow or red/brown and finally fall. Such fallen leaves are a valuable resource for gardening and landscaping. Dry leaves are a type of organic matter that is high in carbon and low in nitrogen. They are often dry, brittle, and may retain their original structure. Used as mulch, they can retain soil moisture, insulate plants from cold, and suppress weeds.  Dry leaves may become compost and contribute to soil health by providing a natural fertilizer. Additionally, they can be used in craft projects and even as insulation for garden sheds. A healthy soil consists of humus, the organic component of soil, primarily composed of decayed plant and animal matter. It includes carbon, nitrogen, and other elements like phosphorus and sulfur. 

The best way of managing dry leaves is to leave them where they fell. Perhaps some may be skeptical when I say this. But consider this. There are vast areas of forests where, every season, trees shed leaves, but no one is concerned about that. What happens to these leaves? They decay, decompose, and become the organic component of the soil, namely humus. This enables new trees to get manure from decomposed animal and plant matter. Soil that consists of sand particles only has no nutritional value except that it holds the roots. It is the organic matter that further gets converted into nutrients, such as nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), as well as organic compounds and essential elements necessary for plant growth. If someone still wants to treat the dry leaves, they can try composting or using them as mulch. Composting helps improve soil, while mulching provides moisture retention and weed control. In the 90s, I used to trek into the dense evergreen forests (Sholas) of Kodaikanal, which are known for their spongy floor. The floor may hold fallen leaves that could be dated a few thousand years. The leaves mix with rainwater to serve as a blotting paper, giving a cushioning effect while walking. If one experiments digging to trace the rock bottom, it may be about one or two meters deep sometimes. These are all the sources of fertility of the soil. Dry leaves and dead animals are great contributors to soil fertility. They are not a menace. Nature has appointed them to do so. We should not create a barren land, but leave the dry leaves as such.

Tit for tat, eye for eye… such emotional outbursts are quite common when it comes to war! The common man thinks the solution to all terrorist activities must be responded to on the same scale. Especially those who were affected by a bomb blast, a terror activity, or an unprovoked attack will feel so, and it is but natural. However, the cost of such attacks cannot be compensated by either money or revengeful retaliations. True that such heinous crimes will end in a large-scale disaster if not arrested in time. However, history has shown that the war is not a permanent solution. When the missiles and drones pitch fire on undisclosed targets, it is beyond doubt that there will be huge collateral damage besides the targeted spot. Tracing the flesh and blood of human bodies and animals amidst the rubble is pathetic. Leave alone the valuables that get destroyed in the attacks. We are daily hearing stories of one or other attack on the Gaza Strip or the Russo-Ukrainian War.

Thousands of multi-story buildings, passenger vehicles, and other properties are being reduced to rubble, rubbish, and ruins. Economic loss apart, we have witnessed the drastic destruction of the environment. War and armed conflict significantly degrade the environment through various means, including direct destruction of ecosystems, pollution from military activities, and the exploitation of natural resources. These impacts can lead to long-lasting consequences like food and water insecurity, biodiversity loss, and the displacement of populations. Construction of military bases may destroy forests, wetlands, and other natural habitats, leading to habitat loss and biodiversity decline. The chemical weapons may affect water sources, soils, and air with hazardous substances. Flora and fauna will be destroyed, leading to a loss of biodiversity. Innocent civilians may be displaced. The overuse of fossil fuels by military aircraft will emit greenhouse gases. The military attacks mostly target fuel tanks and stations, which speed up the shrinking of fossil fuel stocks. When emotions flare up, there will be an excitement in favour of war. Politicians take mileage out of such mass psychology. Graphics in news media channels showed jaguars, missiles, and drones flying crisscross the TV screen, giving a feel of seeing war pictures of a possible 3^rd World War. Any such act might result in the escalation of the war situation and the ultimate decimation of the precious natural resources. Besides innocent lives, the ultimate victim would be the environment. We should not forget that a 3^rd World War would make the planet Earth a barren land (Picture courtesy: a representative picture from the Internet)

Published on 10.5.25 in South Express

Why are trees always targeted? Are there no alternatives for trees? Can’t we produce more oxygen in the lab?

Such questions repeatedly surface among students. Why are trees treated as priceless? Is it true that we can’t estimate the worth of a tree? Long ago, a research study computed the value of a grown-up tree as Rs 1 Crore. In January 2020, then Chief Justice S.A. Bobde instructed a committee of experts to evaluate the loss of trees to the environment. The panel estimated the economic value of a tree as Rs 74500 multiplied by its age. In other words, a 100-year-old tree will be worth Rs 74,50000. Heritage trees with a lifespan of over 100 years could be valued at more than Rs 1 crore. By adding the costs of micronutrients and compost, living trees will more often than not outweigh the benefit of most of the projects they are felled for, as per the committee’s report. Unfortunately, when calculating the cost-benefit analysis of an infrastructure project, the authorities never speak about the environmental costs of felling trees for the project. Project reports make a passing remark, that’s all. Sometimes the reports suggest transplantation of well-grown trees, but do not discuss the feasibility of transplantation and maintenance. In Bangalore, the Metro rail construction had initiated compensatory plantation. But there is no provision for a reality check about the number of trees removed or the number of trees compensated. Even if ten saplings are planted for felling one tree, where is the real compensation for the environmental degradation meted out to the spot where the felled tree existed?   Moreover, ten new and young saplings cannot compensate the loss due to the felling of a 50-year-old tree in terms of the economic values as mentioned above.

While everyone knows the environmental value of a tree, it is painful to note that all over India, whether it is Hyderabad, Bangalore, Delhi, or Uttarakhand, massive tree felling has become the order of the day, in the name of a new infrastructure project. Nowadays, wherever new projects are proposed, the contractors erect huge compound walls that hide the happenings behind the walls. After erecting walls, whether tunneling, felling trees, or destroying a water body, becomes easier. Recently, a small forest stretch near Dwarka, adjacent to the International Airport, vanished overnight. Tree felling happens at midnight when the world sleeps, using chainsaws within a fraction of a minute. The old timers cannot forget the once beautiful PUSA road in West Delhi before the erection of metro pillars. Those born after 2000 may not even imagine that the road was once a boulevard. We do not preach against development, but the planners of development conveniently forget the economic value of trees and blame climate change when the weather is getting hotter. Bangalore, the once garden city is now a concrete jungle!